Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
No. of Rows 1
Tolerance Normal (PN)
End Type Open End
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
I.D. 150 mm
Precision Ground Yes
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Cage Type Solid Machined
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Rows of Balls Single
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
O.D. 320 mm
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Enclosure Open
Inch/Metric Metric
Bore Type Round Bore
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Series 3
Capacity High Capacity
Material Steel
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Relubrication Feature Without
Static Load Rating 965 kN
O.D. Type Cylindrical
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Bearing Type Radial
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison