Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Enclosure Open
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
I.D. 150 mm
O.D. 320 mm
Bearing Type Radial
Relubrication Feature Without
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Series 3
Rows of Balls Single
Capacity High Capacity
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Inch/Metric Metric
Cage Type Solid Machined
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
End Type Open End
Bore Type Round Bore
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Material Steel
Static Load Rating 965 kN
O.D. Type Cylindrical
Precision Ground Yes
No. of Rows 1
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison